Re: [NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-03-01 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
described in the following example, when in fact all should work without error (as I understand it, but perhaps \starttexdefinition has other limits of which I am not aware). % macros=mkvi % Fails to compile with TL2013 and current beta %\starttexdefinition Test #1¦#2. % #1, #2

Re: [NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-03-01 Thread Rik Kabel
patterns difficult to use with Mark VI parameter names. Thus, we have the situation described in the following example, when in fact all should work without error (as I understand it, but perhaps \starttexdefinition has other limits of which I am not aware). % macros=mkvi % Fails to compile

[NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-02-28 Thread Rik Kabel
% macros=mkvi \setupwhitespace[small] \def\ä^?z{Ä^?} \def\Named[#PARAMETERNAME]{¦#PARAMETERNAME¦} \def\Numbered[#1]{¦#1¦} \starttext \subject{Regression between TL2013 and current beta} There does appear to have been some change or regression in the definition of allowed characters

Re: [NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-02-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/1/2014 12:45 AM, Rik Kabel wrote: % macros=mkvi \setupwhitespace[small] \def\ä^?z{Ä^?} only letters can make a \cs (not symbols) - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-02-28 Thread Rik Kabel
On 2014-02-28 20:32, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/1/2014 12:45 AM, Rik Kabel wrote: % macros=mkvi \setupwhitespace[small] \def\ä^?z{Ä^?} only letters can make a \cs (not symbols) Clearly this is not currently the case, although I would agree that it should be. Is there any way to enforce

Re: [NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

2012-05-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 14-5-2012 15:59, Philipp Gesang wrote: + leadingcomment ok -- - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 |

Re: [NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

2012-05-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 13-5-2012 13:12, Philipp Gesang wrote: Hi all, seems the mkvi-style macros have trouble with groups in comments: % macros=mkvi \def\dosomething#content{%%%= fine with “#1” % { %%% Open unbalanced brace breaks macros

Re: [NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

2012-05-14 Thread Philipp Gesang
On 2012-05-14 09:35, Hans Hagen wrote: On 13-5-2012 13:12, Philipp Gesang wrote: Hi all, seems the mkvi-style macros have trouble with groups in comments: % macros=mkvi \def\dosomething#content{%%%= fine with “#1

Re: [NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

2012-05-14 Thread Philipp Gesang
On 2012-05-14 15:22, Philipp Gesang wrote: On 2012-05-14 09:35, Hans Hagen wrote: On 13-5-2012 13:12, Philipp Gesang wrote: Hi all, seems the mkvi-style macros have trouble with groups in comments: % macros

[NTG-context] [mkvi] comment handling bug

2012-05-13 Thread Philipp Gesang
Hi all, seems the mkvi-style macros have trouble with groups in comments: % macros=mkvi \def\dosomething#content{%%% = fine with “#1” % { %%% Open unbalanced brace breaks macros. } \starttext \dosomething {foo} \stoptext

[NTG-context] \starttexdefinition and @ in macroname in mkvi

2011-12-30 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Hi, @, !, _ etc.\ are not recognized as part of the macro name when using MkVI named arguments with \starttexdefinition. For example, consider the following example: \unprotect \starttexdefinition test@again #name Name is #name \stoptexdefinition \protect Processing this file using

Re: [NTG-context] \starttexdefinition and @ in macroname in mkvi

2011-12-30 Thread Hans Hagen
On 30-12-2011 10:43, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Hi, @, !, _ etc.\ are not recognized as part of the macro name when using MkVI named arguments with \starttexdefinition. For example, consider the following example: \unprotect \starttexdefinition test@again #name Name is #name \stoptexdefinition